Before I review this movie, I need to give a synopsis of who Elizabeth Holmes is – in case you didn’t know.
She is the founder of Theranos, a Silicon Valley medical technology company that promised to revolutionize blood testing. Her story is one of the most notorious corporate fraud cases in American business history. It is a story of ambition, technological deception, enormous wealth, powerful investors, and ultimately criminal conviction. Born in 1984 in Washington, D.C., she attended Stanford University, where she studied chemical engineering. Chemical engineering is one of the most difficult majors I can think of in college. She is obviously smart. However, in 2003 at just 19 years old, she dropped out of Stanford and founded Theranos. The idea: instead of drawing several tubes of blood from a patient’s arm, Theranos would perform hundreds of medical tests using just a few drops of blood obtained from a finger prick.
The company reached a valuation of approximately $9 billion, and her estimated personal net worth reached $4.5 billion on paper. She became an instant celebrity and was known as one of the world’s youngest self-made female billionaires. She attracted highly sophisticated investors.
There was only one problem: the technology didn’t work. Being an entrepreneur myself, I know what it can be like. Some ideas just don’t work out. You believe in them, you drive hard, but no matter how far you push, it’s not happening. This is obviously more challenging when physical devices and chemical tests are involved. The machines could perform only a limited number of tests reliably. For many others, Theranos secretly used conventional laboratory equipment manufactured by other companies. Despite these problems, Holmes continued promoting the technology to investors, business partners, and the public.
In October 2015, investigative journalist John Carreyrou of The Wall Street Journal published an investigation in which he revealed that Theranos was not actually using its own technology for most of its blood tests. The company finally shut down in 2018. After charges and trials, she began serving an 11-year prison sentence in May 2023.
The movie You Can See Everything is a movie dramatization of the making of a documentary about the period of Holmes’ life just before she reported to prison. It is critically acclaimed and the director Nathan Fielder is generally praised for “…creating a groundbreaking, thought-provoking documentary that challenges assumptions about truth and performance through its complex, layered narrative…”
It runs for 2 hours and 54 minutes, and I was bored through most of it. There are many pointless scenes where we see closeups of faces staring for a long time without any action. The viewer is left to decide whether Holmes was guilty of fraud, because it portrays her as fully believing in what she is doing is right. If I truly believe it, it’s not a lie, right? If I repeat a lie often enough, people start taking it as truth.
The way I see it is that there was a jury that spent much time and deliberation and eventually decided she was guilty and she was going to prison. Having a movie try to make me doubt that reality didn’t make much of an impression on me.
It did prompt me to go and get the book Bad Blood by John Carreyrou, the journalist who first exposed the company and started its eventual downfall. I will read that next and review it separately.
Unless you are a movie critic and want to witness this supposed masterpiece of innovative filmmaking, I do not recommend you see You Can See Everything?













