Sal Paradise is an Italian American youth who lives with his aunt in Paterson, New Jersey in the mid 1940ies, after World War II. This was the time before there were interstate highways in America, and road trips took place on two-lane highways between cities, towns and villages. Sal’s best friend is Dean Moriarty, a thief, criminal and con-artist. The two, along with a sizable cast of losers and grifters, travel back and forth across the country for no particular reason, hanging out in San Francisco (which they call Frisco), New York and Denver for the most part, and touching many other cities, including Mexico, along the way.
On the Road is referenced as a classic in almost every list of best books in the English language. Schools assign it as required reading. I read it because I wanted to check off a classic between more recent science fiction material.
I don’t know what it is with me and classics, but On the Road was one of the most painful books to read, ever. I stuck with it, because I forced myself. Every. Damn. Hour.
There is no story worth telling. There is no plot. The ramblings of the losers on the road are repetitious and vapid. There is no central conflict, there is no suspense. After about a quarter into the book I realized it was not going to change. On the Road is the most mind-numbingly boring and uninteresting book I have ever touched. There is nothing to learn. There is no moral. There isn’t even an ending. Just a bunch of characters that I could not relate to and I can’t imagine anyone else can relate to.
Sal Paradise is Jack Kerouac, and Dean Moriarty is modeled after the beatnik Neal Cassady. I guess if you lived in the 1940s, perhaps this story was one you could relate to. But, alas, I was born ten years later.
There were some descriptions of the American West that elicited nostalgia in me. I have spent many a day in my twenties traveling the long, endless highways across Texas and the plains, up and down Arizona and California, and across Colorado, riding the road from coast to coast and back again. Those were beautiful days, weeks, months and years, and reading On the Road got me in the mood for a long road trip.
However, I am most certainly not going to read any more books by Kerouac.
Note about the Kindle Edition: This book of full of bad punctuation, spelling errors, fragmented sentences, I presume due to automated conversion from the printed page. I guess Amazon could not afford to make a single editor go through the pain it put us paying customers through and actually read the book and fix the multitude of errors. Shame on Amazon!

I have it in my to-read list; now, I’m not so sure.
I am really curious how you’ll do with it. Let me know.
I will. And, hey, that’s a great profile picture!
I agree with you. I think it is a very disappointing book, and wonder why it and Kerouac are considered so special.
I have only one suggestion: there is something deeply American about going on the road for adventure. Was this the first novel that developed that theme? It can be compared to Walker Percy’s first novel, “The Moviegoer.” That novel has a weak plot and a bad second half. But the idea that Americans are moviegoers and live in characters and scenes from movies–that is an insight.
So here is my best defense (which is not much of a defense): a great American novel should be written about exploring “On the Road;” and Americans are increasingly living in the movies, living as “The Moviegoer.”
But neither famous novel is actually very good.
Thanks for your insight. I am glad I am not the only one. I am reading another Nevil Shute now, No Highway, which is a strange throw-back to the 1950s.