Last week I visited the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) and saw the original Tea in the Garden by Henri Matisse. I love Matisse, and most of his contemporaries including van Gogh (my favorite), Monet, Manet, Gaugin, Cezanne, Seurat – and many others of the period. When I go to an art museum, I usually seek out those artists first, before I wonder off into rooms with the older European paintings.
Often it strikes me how “unfinished” the paintings of the masters are. I saw many versions of van Gogh’s irises (Google it and you will see) where there is bare canvas between brushstrokes indicating leaves.
Recently I visited my friend (PG) in Germany, who loves the expressionists, and is a hobby painter himself, and we talked about how crappy some of the paintings of the masters are. Sections of the paintings obviously don’t fit together and were completed at different times with different palettes. The drawing is often atrocious. The detail shoddy. The finish – oh, the finish!
In Tea in the Garden, all of this occurs. This is a very large painting (140 x 211 cm). The woman sitting in the center is a model of Matisse. The woman on the right is his daughter. The drawing of both is atrocious. These figures would not make it in any live drawing class in a community college today. The form of the dog is miserable. The background, to the left of the tree, is divided into three distinguished sections, almost done separately. It looks like they were not completed when he thought the rest of the painting was finished and he quickly slapped down some paint to “finish” them. They don’t even work with each other. The path on the left does not look like a path. It’s way too dark and defined in the back to look real. The chairs are poorly defined and sloppy. The back legs of the right chair are too light in the shadow and therefore not “real.” I could go on and on.
If this were my painting, this would be my very first draft. Assuming the paint was still wet, I’d now take a rag and wipe it all into the canvas, producing the overall “feeling” of the painting, and then I’d lay detail over the top of it. I would put at least another 100 hours of work into it before I would call it finished.
I am a dilettante. Matisse is a master. I have never sold a painting – haven’t even tried. Matisse’s work is in the best museums in the world. Perhaps, after you have a name, your drafts, your crappy work, is also famous?
I love Matisse. He inspires me. But standing in front of Tea in the Garden, I can’t but say that it’s a crappy, unfinished painting. Not even pleasant to look at.
Please, my artist readers, talk me down!
5 thoughts on “Painting: Tea in the Garden – by Matisse”
Woah, I wasn’t able to notice and appreciate all these things in this painting until I read you!
Reblogged this on Norbert Haupt and commented:
Came across this 3-year-old post about sloppy paintings by the masters. Thought I should repost it.
I bought a print of it in a flea market and was proud to give it a prominent place in my house. It is, however, awful. Also, the table is much too high. Then I remembered a museum dedicated to bad art: http://museumofbadart.org/
Thanks! I am not the only one!!
And I never even noticed the table height, either, until you just pointed it out!